This post is inspired by a video of McKinsey Quarterly featuring Jacqueline Novogratz-CEO, Acumen fund. She mentions that her fund is dedicated to the cause of bridging the gap between the rich and the poor. It revived in me a debate i've often had on why there is poverty, can it be eliminated and if so how?
The existence of the poor is even mentioned in the golden period of Indian mythology-under Ram Rajya (period under the reign of King Rama a Hindu god) and also in the time of Christ. If it was something that could be wished away why did these god-men not eliminate poverty?
Continuing efforts to get rid of poverty through long standing supply of aid and effort of charitable organisations has not helped in fighting this stigma by a lot (though i would not say that there efforts are in vain; they play a vital role by creating awareness of this problem amongst the developed countries). This is because poverty is not just a problem of lack of monetary wealth but it also gets a grip on the psychology and spiritual character of the person it inflicts.
Actually, early Christian missionaries, consciously or unconsciously were able to address the problem at almost all levels. They were able to offer monetary help and also vitally provide support for physical and mental health and healing. They also successfully broke the negative spiral which can surround an individual in poverty and helped them become a part of a new 'higher' grouping. Perhaps the only things that did not work for them was their over zealousness to convert people to the christian religion and that they did not teach the 'converts' self-sustaining enterprise.
I was once told by my spiritual guru that you cannot get rid of darkness by fighting it head-on, you get rid of it by bringing in a lamp, a ray of light. Poverty, quite like darkness cannot be fought from just within but requires a positive external intervention at the physical, mental, spiritual and economic level.
Mahatma Gandhi, rightly understanding this, addressed each aspect of the problem- including the one left out by the missionaries- the economic problem. His dictum to the teeming poor and untouchables of India in asking them to spin the charkha (weaver's wheel to spin cotton) was aimed exactly at creating sustainable socio-economic development.
Modern charity and aid NGOs (Non Governmental Organisations)have also begun to realise that they cannot fight poverty by simply collecting and transferring donations from the rich to the poor. They need to make themselves and those they wish to help self-sustaining by operating akin to a for-profit enterprise.
CK Prahlad has brought a lot of corporate attention to the real profit making opportunity in addressing the social needs of the most downtrodden by talking of 'value at the bottom of the pyramid'.
Still can poverty be eliminated? I dont know. When i asked a seer this question, she simply told me that all fingers are not equal. However, i strongly believe that even if poverty cannot be eliminated, its causes can be addressed and the window of opportunity and hope widened to give many at least a chance.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

1 comment:
I often think of this subject. Yep, you are right the Jesuits did a half-baked job there and much damage if you ask me - altogether wiping out indigenous tribes.
Mahatma’s ways were great. In fact a research done by evolutionary psychologist (way back in the 1980s) say that more technologically advanced the society – the more its people slip into depression. Mahatma was himself inspired by Tolstoy. Tolstoy says and I quote, “… Therefore the urban man who's living in a manner contrary to his natural needs deteriorates mentally as well as morally. Modern urban man, simply put, is crazy. This happens as a natural result of his lying to himself about what he needs and wants and what will make him happy.”
This might be digressing a bit from the point the blog is making, but if we all acquire the joys of simple living, this, to a great extent will eliminate poverty.
Poonam
Post a Comment